Paradoxical Thinking
Chapter 3 - Experiential Growth Method®
Previous page: Integrative Thinking - Paradoxical Thinking - Next page: Wisdom
Back to Book content or directly to Main Page or EGM
.
Welcome to the Paradoxical Thinking page
.
Imagine you are searching for the most dull, uninteresting number in the whole universe. Image you found it. Wouldn't that be very interesting?
.
Paradoxical thinking is defined as the capacity to engage with opposing forces or ideas that coexist and influence one another over time. This involves recognising that these contradictions are not merely problems to be solved but are integral to understanding complex situations, especially in leadership and organisational contexts.
.
Core ideas
.
Thinking about the concept
A visual thesaurus search is always an excellent starting point to discuss a concept definition:
| PARADOX |
|---|
| https://www.freethesaurus.com/paradox |
| CONTRADICTION |
|---|
| https://www.freethesaurus.com/contradiction |
.
Description
For every good argument about policy, there is usually a counterargument that should at least be considered. If you are a staunch pacifist who believes that the threat of military intervention will never bring peace, you should be open to the possibility that you are wrong about Iran. The same advice applies to a hawk who believes that soft tactics of appeasement will never get you anywhere. Both sides should list signs that might nudge them toward the other's position.
Now comes the tricky part. In classical dialectics, thesis and antithesis meet and synthesis is the result. With paradoxical thinking, many different points of view meet and must be merged into a single view. There are no simple rules here. It is an art that requires you to forge a whole out of irreducibly subjective judgments. If you do it right, this process can transform you from a simple-minded dove or hawk into a remarkable hybrid, a dove-hawk whose nuanced perspective can choose the moments when hard or soft tactics have a chance of success.
.
How to
Embracing Contradictions
Paradoxical thinking encourages embracing contradictions and tensions rather than trying to resolve them into a single "right" answer. This is crucial for navigating the inherent complexities and paradoxes present in many real-world problems. This approach encourages reframing problems from "Should I choose A or B?" to "How can I accommodate both A and B?" This reframing opens up possibilities for innovative solutions that leverage the strengths of both sides.
Avoiding Oversimplification
Paradoxical thinking cautions against oversimplified, binary, or linear thinking. It recognizes that the real world is full of paradoxes that cannot be easily reduced to a simple either/or solution. This mindset is essential for dealing with the nuance and ambiguity of complex problems.
Fostering Adaptability
Paradoxical thinking requires organisations and leaders to be more adaptable, flexible, and creative in problem-solving rather than relying on pre-defined "best practices." This adaptability is crucial for navigating the uncertainty of complex challenges and changing their nature.Individuals practicing paradoxical thinking shift their mindset from seeking a single solution to exploring how multiple, seemingly conflicting options can coexist. This requires a willingness to accept ambiguity and uncertainty.
Valuing Diverse Perspectives
Paradoxical thinking highlights the importance of encouraging diverse viewpoints, psychological safety, and collaboration to navigate complex, paradoxical situations. Singular, top-down solutions often need to be revised for such problems. Rather than attempting to resolve tensions, paradoxical thinkers focus on navigating them. This means acknowledging the ongoing nature of these contradictions and adapting strategies as situations evolve.
Acknowledging Uncertainty
Paradoxical thinking recognises that knowledge has inherent limits and that uncertainty is unavoidable. It emphasizes humility and a willingness to experiment rather than claiming to have all the answers. This mindset is essential for dealing with the ambiguity of complex problems.
.
Deep Dive
.
Examples of Paradoxical Thinking in Leadership
- Autonomy vs. Control: Leaders often face the challenge of granting their teams autonomy while also needing to maintain oversight and control. This requires a balance where leaders empower employees to make decisions while ensuring accountability and alignment with organizational goals.
- Innovation vs. Operational Excellence: Organizations frequently struggle with fostering a culture of innovation while maintaining high standards of operational efficiency. Leaders must find ways to encourage creative thinking and risk-taking without compromising the effectiveness and reliability of existing processes.
- Humility vs. Confidence: Effective leaders need to exhibit both humility, by valuing team contributions, and confidence, by making decisive choices. This paradox requires leaders to recognize their limitations while also projecting authority and conviction in their decisions.
- Short-term Results vs. Long-term Vision: Leaders often need to balance the pressure for immediate results with the necessity of pursuing long-term strategic goals. This involves making decisions that may not yield instant benefits but are crucial for sustainable growth.
- Local vs. Global Focus: In a globalized business environment, leaders must navigate the tension between being deeply embedded in local markets while also aligning with global strategies. This requires understanding local needs and preferences while leveraging global resources and capabilities.
- Flexibility vs. Structure: Leaders must create an environment that allows for flexibility and adaptability while ensuring that there are clear structures and processes in place. This involves encouraging innovation within a framework that provides guidance and support.
.