Dimensional thinkers
Chapter 1 - Worldview
Previous page: Agency - Dimensional thinkers - Next page: Dimensional thinking pro & con
Back to Book content or directly to Main Page
.
Welcome to the Dimensional thinkers page
.
Dimensions are guiding metaphors for the complex reality that we are and our context is. They structure the totality of our world of experienc
- Direction provides the 'expansiveness' of your world model
- Hidden layers are fields created by the 'action' and 'evaluation' dimension
- On top, all layers together create the third 'potention' dimension
.
Dimensions overview
.
.
3 Dimensions each with each two directions
| Autonomy | <> | Participation |
|---|---|---|
| Human autonomy refers to the ability of a person to make their own decisions and act independently. This means they can think for themselves and act on their judgment and free will rather than being controlled (or influenced) by others.
.
|
Human participation refers to the involvement of people in activities or processes that affect their lives or communities. Taking part can include decision-making, development or activities.
.
|
.
| Connectedness | <> | Coherence |
|---|---|---|
| Human connectedness refers to the state of being connected or related to something else. It can include participating in activities or processes and working with others.
.
|
Human coherence refers to being logical and consistent or fitting together in a way that makes sense. It can apply to many things, including ideas, arguments, and explanations.
.
|
.
| Competences | <> | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Human competences refers to the ability to do something well or effectively. It can refer to a specific skill or knowledge, working well in a team, or solving problems.
.
|
Relevance refers to the relationship or connection between something and the context in which it is being considered. Something relevant is related or applicable to the situation or problem at hand and is, therefore, essential or valuable to consider.
.
|
.
Dimensional thinkers
.
Richard Lewontin - Darwinism
.
| 1-Why | 2-How | 3-What | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Interests | Values | Goals |
| Dimensions | Action dimension | Evaluation dimension | Potention dimension |
| Description | Different variants leave different numbers of offspring either in immediate or remote generations (the principle of differential fitness) | There is variation in morphological, physiological, and behavioral traits among members of a species (the principle of variation) | The variation is in part heritable, so that individuals resemble their relations more than they resemble unrelated individuals and, in particular, offspring resemble their parents (the principle of heredity) |
| Concepts | Differential fitness | Phenotypic variation | Fitness is heritable |
| Definitions of the above | Different phenotypes have different rates of survival and reproduction in different environments | Different individuals in a population have different morphologies, physiologies, and behaviors | There is a correlation between parents and offspring in the contribution of each to future generations |
.
These three principles embody the principle of evolution by natural selection. While they hold, a population will undergo evolutionary change.
.
| Content Source |
|---|
| DARWINIAN POPULATIONS AND NATURAL SELECTION - Peter Godfrey-Smith |
.
.
Max Boisot - Information Space
.
| 1-Why | 2-How | 3-What | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Interests | Values | Goals |
| Dimensions | Action dimension | Evaluation dimension | Potention dimension |
| From | Knowledge tied to particular cases or events, becoming more and more abstract (autonomy) | Highly codified knowledge (e.g. a patent or technical manual) systematically classified, compressed and expressed in standardized categories (coherence) | Information with confined access to a narrow group or an individual (competencies) |
| To | Knowledge expressed in broader concepts, models or rules that summarise patterns across many cases (participation) | Uncodified knowledge which is more tacit: it cannot easily be captured in writing or formal representations without losing essential aspects of the experience (connectedness) | Information accessible to a large proportion of the relevant population, with codification and abstraction generally increasing its potential reach in a given time period |
| Concepts | Abstraction | Codification | Diffusion |
| Definitions of the above | Abstraction is the degree to which knowledge has been stripped of concrete, context‑specificdetails and reduced to general, salient characteristics that apply across many situations | Codification is the degree to which knowledge has been structured, formalised and expressed in a symbolic form (a “code”) so that it can be stored, transmitted and processed independently of the original experience | Diffusion is the degree to which a given piece of information or knowledge is shared across a population of agents - how widely and easily it has spread from its point of origin |
.
The ‘dimensional’ approach to the classification of types of knowledge is a very useful way of looking at capabilities development and value creation. For example, we can see that for a given capability we are likely to be interested in all three dimensions.
- By abstracting knowledge, the potential for applying the capability into new areas is enhanced.
- By codifying knowledge defining a capability, it increases the potential for diffusing the capability to others.
- Finally, the degree of diffusion will define the potential for gaining value.
.
| Content Source |
|---|
| Open University |
.
.
Hannah Arendt - Acting
.
| 1-Why | 2-How | 3-What | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Interests | Values | Goals |
| Dimensions | Action dimension | Evaluation dimension | Potention dimension |
| From | What is important for me (autonomy) | What has meaning to me (coherence) | My competencies |
| To | What is important for us (participation) | What is the meaning for us (connectedness) | the relevance of actions for the bigger situation |
| Concepts | Labour | Work | Action |
| Definitions of the above | Labour is judged by its ability to sustain human life, to cater to our biological needs of consumption and reproduction | Work is judged by its ability to build and maintain a world fit for human use | Action is judged by its ability to disclose the identity of the agent, to affirm the reality of the world, and to actualize our capacity for freedom |
.
Although Arendt considers the three activities of labour, work and action equally necessary to a complete human life, in the sense that each contributes in its distinctive way to the realization of our human capacities, it is clear from her writings that she takes action to be the differentia specifica of human beings, that which distinguishes them from both the life of animals (who are similar to us insofar as they need to labor to sustain and reproduce themselves) and the life of the gods (with whom we share, intermittently, the activity of contemplation). In this respect the categories of labour and work, while significant in themselves, must be seen as counterpoints to the category of action, helping to differentiate and highlight the place of action within the order of the vita activa.
.
| Content Source |
|---|
| Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Lemma: Hannah Arendt |
.
Hannah Arendt - The life of the mind
.
| 1-Why | 2-How | 3-What | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Interests | Values | Goals |
| Dimensions | Action dimension | Evaluation dimension | Potention dimension |
| From | What is important for me (autonomy) | What has meaning to me (coherence) | My competencies |
| To | What is important for us (participation) | What is the meaning for us (connectedness) | The relevance of actions for the bigger situation |
| Concepts | Willing | Judging | Thinking |
| Definitions of the above | The freedom to choose between two or more possibilities and to realize or actualize one of those possibilities | Whoever judges takes responsibility for the world | Thinking is dialogue, the active investigation and articulation of meaning and purpose.Not the thirst for knowledge, but the question of meaning drives thinking activity.Thinking withdraws itself from utility and resides in the domain of purpose and meaning |
.
| Content Source |
|---|
| Het leven van de Geest - Ten Have - 2025 |
.
.
Jay Van Bavel - Judgement
.
| 1-Why | 2-How | 3-What | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Interests | Values | Goals |
| Dimensions | Action dimension | Evaluation dimension | Potention dimension |
| From | What is important for me (autonomy) | What has meaning to me (coherence) | My competencies |
| To | What is important for us (participation) | What is the meaning for us (connectedness) | The relevance of actions for the bigger situation |
| Concepts | Hedonic (decision making) | Moral (decision making) | Pragmatic (decision making) |
| Definitions of the above | Hedonic decisions focussing on pleasure | Based on what’s right or wrong, and rooted in social norms and values,judgment is likely to become loaded with emotion and feels more extreme | Pragmatic decisions weights the practical costs and benefits |
.
Every day, each of us makes countless evaluations. Whether you rely more on a pragmatic, moral or hedonic perspective to evaluate an object or action depends on multiple considerations, including your goals and the social context. The way you look at a problem might change based on how you feel at that moment, or whether you are alone or accompanied by a friend. And this can fundamentally change how you judge the goodness of something. The decision about where to buy a coffee can be based on hedonic ones (eg, which café has the most delicious coffee?), moral ones (eg, is the café ethical in the way they treat their staff ?) or pragmatic considerations (eg, which café has the cheapest prices?).
.
| Content Source |
|---|
| Clara Pretus & Jay Van Bavel |
.
.