Dimensional thinkers
Chapter 1 - Worldview
Previous page: Dimensional thinking and doing - Dimensional thinkers - Next page: Dimensional thinking pro & con
Back to Book content or directly to Main Page
.
Welcome to the Dimensional thinkers page
.
Dimensions are guiding metaphors for the complex reality that we are and our context is. They structure the totality of our agency
- Direction provides the 'expansiveness' of your world model
- Hidden layers are fields created by the 'action' and 'evaluation' dimension
- On top, all layers together create the third 'potention' dimension
.
Dimensions overview
.
.
3 Dimensions each with each two directions
| Autonomy | <> | Participation |
|---|---|---|
| Human autonomy refers to the ability of a person to make their own decisions and act independently. This means they can think for themselves and act on their judgment and free will rather than being controlled (or influenced) by others.
.
|
Human participation refers to the involvement of people in activities or processes that affect their lives or communities. Taking part can include decision-making, development or activities.
.
|
.
| Connectedness | <> | Coherence |
|---|---|---|
| Human connectedness refers to the state of being connected or related to something else. It can include participating in activities or processes and working with others.
.
|
Human coherence refers to being logical and consistent or fitting together in a way that makes sense. It can apply to many things, including ideas, arguments, and explanations.
.
|
.
| Competences | <> | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Human competences refers to the ability to do something well or effectively. It can refer to a specific skill or knowledge, working well in a team, or solving problems.
.
|
Relevance refers to the relationship or connection between something and the context in which it is being considered. Something relevant is related or applicable to the situation or problem at hand and is, therefore, essential or valuable to consider.
.
|
.
Dimensional thinkers
.
Aristoteles
.
| 1-Why | 2-How | 3-What | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Interests | Values | Goals |
| Dimensions | Action dimension | Evaluation dimension | Potention dimension |
| Soul (De Anima) | |||
| Concepts | Vegetative soul (threptikon) | Sensitive soul (aisthetikon) | Rational soul (logikon/noetikon) |
| Definitions of the above | The lowest level, shared by all living things including plants; responsible for nutrition, growth, and reproduction | Found in all animals; adds sensory perception, emotion, and desire on top of vegetative functions | Unique to humans; adds reason, thought, deliberation, and intellectual contemplation |
| Ways of Life | |||
| Concepts | The political life | Life of enjoyment | The contemplative life (bios theoretikos) |
| Definitions of the above | Devoted to honour and civic virtue; active engagement in governance and public affairs | Devoted to pleasure; Aristotle deems it slavish and more fitting of animals than of humans | Devoted to philosophical contemplation (theoria); Aristotle ultimately identifies this in Book X as the highest and happiest life, since it engages the best part of us (reason) in its finest activity |
| Goods | |||
| Concepts | Bodily goods | Goods of the soul | External goods |
| Definitions of the above | Health, strength, vitality, and pleasure | Knowledge, virtue, wisdom, friendship | Wealth, honour, food, shelter, and material necessities |
| Modes of Persuasion | |||
| Concepts | Ethos | Pathos | Logos |
| Definitions of the above | Persuasion through the speaker's character and credibility; audiences are more willing to trust someone they perceive as knowledgeable, honest, and good-willed | Persuasion by stirring the emotions of the audience; a speech that places hearers in the right emotional state makes them more receptive to the argument | Persuasion through logical argument, evidence, and rational proof; Aristotle considered this the most strictly intellectual mode |
| Slighting (Oligoria) | |||
| Concepts | Spite (epereasmos) | Insolence (hubris) | Contempt (kataphronesis) |
| Definitions of the above | Thwarting another person's wishes not for your own gain but purely to prevent theirs; the slight comes from the implicit message that the other person cannot harm or benefit you | Doing or saying things that cause shame to the victim, not for any purpose to yourself but for the pleasure it gives; Aristotle notes the insolent man thinks himself superior when he ill-treats others | Treating something as obviously of no importance; you slight what you consider trivial |
| Friendship | |||
| Concepts | Friendship of virtue | Friendship of pleasure | Friendship of utility |
| Definitions of the above | Based on mutual admiration of good character; each friend wishes the good of the other for the other's sake. This is the highest, rarest, and most enduring form | Based on enjoying each other's company. Most common among the young, it tends to be fleeting as tastes change | Based on mutual benefit; each party values the other for what they can get. Common in business or transactional relationships, and dissolves when the usefulness ends |
| Science | |||
| Concepts | Productive science | Practical science | Theoretical science |
| Definitions of the above | Concerned with making (poiesis): crafts, arts, and techniques (techne). The principle of movement lies in the producer, not the product | Concerned with knowledge of action (praxis): ethics, politics, and economics. Their objects are contingent human choices | Pursued for knowledge itself, not any practical end. Subdivided into natural philosophy, mathematics, and theology (first philosophy/metaphysics). These achieve the highest certainty because their objects are necessary and unchanging |
.
Aristoteles - Politics
.
| 1-Why | 2-How | 3-What | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Interests | Values | Goals |
| Dimensions | Action dimension | Evaluation dimension | Potention dimension |
| From 'True Form' (for common good) | Monarchy (rule by one) | Aristocracy (rule by the virtuous few) | Polity (rule by the many) |
| Definitions of the above | Rule by a single person in the common interest. "The first and most divine" form of government, where the monarch is pre-eminent in virtue and governs like a father over his household | Rule by a small number of the best citizens (from aristos, "best"), chosen for their virtue and excellence, in the interest of all. It is preferable to kingship when several equally virtuous men can be found | Rule by the many (the citizen body at large) for the common good. Aristotle considers this the best practicable form for most cities, since it blends democratic and oligarchic elements and is upheld by a strong middle class |
| To 'Perverted Form' (for rulers' benefit) | Tyranny | Oligarchy | Democracy |
| Definitions of the above | The corruption of kingship: rule by one person purely for his own benefit, not the people's | The corruption of aristocracy: rule by the wealthy few for their own enrichment. The defining mark is not merely small numbers but wealth as the qualification for power — wherever the rich rule in their own interest, it is an oligarchy regardless of how many | The corruption of polity: rule by the poor majority for their own benefit at the expense of the wealthy. Aristotle's definition here is notably different from the modern positive sense: "democracy exists when the free and poor, being a majority, have authority to rule" in their own sectional interest rather than the common good |
.
Richard Lewontin - Darwinism
.
| 1-Why | 2-How | 3-What | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Interests | Values | Goals |
| Dimensions | Action dimension | Evaluation dimension | Potention dimension |
| Description | Different variants leave different numbers of offspring either in immediate or remote generations (the principle of differential fitness) | There is variation in morphological, physiological, and behavioral traits among members of a species (the principle of variation) | The variation is in part heritable, so that individuals resemble their relations more than they resemble unrelated individuals and, in particular, offspring resemble their parents (the principle of heredity) |
| Concepts | Differential fitness | Phenotypic variation | Fitness is heritable |
| Definitions of the above | Different phenotypes have different rates of survival and reproduction in different environments | Different individuals in a population have different morphologies, physiologies, and behaviors | There is a correlation between parents and offspring in the contribution of each to future generations |
.
These three principles embody the principle of evolution by natural selection. While they hold, a population will undergo evolutionary change.
.
| Content Source |
|---|
| DARWINIAN POPULATIONS AND NATURAL SELECTION - Peter Godfrey-Smith |
.
.
Max Boisot - Information Space
.
| 1-Why | 2-How | 3-What | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Interests | Values | Goals |
| Dimensions | Action dimension | Evaluation dimension | Potention dimension |
| From | Knowledge tied to particular cases or events, becoming more and more abstract (autonomy) | Highly codified knowledge (e.g. a patent or technical manual) systematically classified, compressed and expressed in standardized categories (coherence) | Information with confined access to a narrow group or an individual (competencies) |
| To | Knowledge expressed in broader concepts, models or rules that summarise patterns across many cases (participation) | Uncodified knowledge which is more tacit: it cannot easily be captured in writing or formal representations without losing essential aspects of the experience (connectedness) | Information accessible to a large proportion of the relevant population, with codification and abstraction generally increasing its potential reach in a given time period |
| Concepts | Abstraction | Codification | Diffusion |
| Definitions of the above | Abstraction is the degree to which knowledge has been stripped of concrete, context‑specificdetails and reduced to general, salient characteristics that apply across many situations | Codification is the degree to which knowledge has been structured, formalised and expressed in a symbolic form (a “code”) so that it can be stored, transmitted and processed independently of the original experience | Diffusion is the degree to which a given piece of information or knowledge is shared across a population of agents - how widely and easily it has spread from its point of origin |
.
The ‘dimensional’ approach to the classification of types of knowledge is a very useful way of looking at capabilities development and value creation. For example, we can see that for a given capability we are likely to be interested in all three dimensions.
- By abstracting knowledge, the potential for applying the capability into new areas is enhanced.
- By codifying knowledge defining a capability, it increases the potential for diffusing the capability to others.
- Finally, the degree of diffusion will define the potential for gaining value.
.
| Content Source |
|---|
| Open University |
.
.
Hannah Arendt - Acting
.
| 1-Why | 2-How | 3-What | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Interests | Values | Goals |
| Dimensions | Action dimension | Evaluation dimension | Potention dimension |
| From | What is important for me (autonomy) | What has meaning to me (coherence) | My competencies |
| To | What is important for us (participation) | What is the meaning for us (connectedness) | the relevance of actions for the bigger situation |
| Concepts | Labour | Work | Action |
| Hannah Arendt | Labor is the activity which corresponds to the biological process of the human body, whose spontaneous growth, metabolism, and eventual decay are bound to the vital necessities produced and fed into the life process by labor. The human condition of labor is life itself. | Work is the activity which corresponds to the unnaturalness of human existence, which is not imbedded in, and whose mortality is not compensated by, the species' ever-recurring life cycle. Work provides an "artificial" world of things, distinctly different from all natural surroundings. Within its borders each individual life is housed, while this world itself is meant to outlast and transcend them all. The human condition of work is worldliness. | Action, the only activity that goes on directly between men without the intermediary of things or matter, corresponds to the human condition of plurality, to the fact that men, not Man, live on the earth and inhabit the world. While all aspects of the human condition are somehow related to politics, this plurality is specifically the condition-—not only the conditio sine qua non, but the conditio per quam—of all political life. |
| Definitions of the above | Labour is judged by its ability to sustain human life, to cater to our biological needs of consumption and reproduction | Work is judged by its ability to build and maintain a world fit for human use | Action is judged by its ability to disclose the identity of the agent, to affirm the reality of the world, and to actualize our capacity for freedom |
.
Although Arendt considers the three activities of labour, work and action equally necessary to a complete human life, in the sense that each contributes in its distinctive way to the realization of our human capacities, it is clear from her writings that she takes action to be the differentia specifica of human beings, that which distinguishes them from both the life of animals (who are similar to us insofar as they need to labor to sustain and reproduce themselves) and the life of the gods (with whom we share, intermittently, the activity of contemplation). In this respect the categories of labour and work, while significant in themselves, must be seen as counterpoints to the category of action, helping to differentiate and highlight the place of action within the order of the vita activa.
.
| Content Source |
|---|
| Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Lemma: Hannah Arendt |
| Hannah Arendt - The human condition |
.
Hannah Arendt - The life of the mind
.
| 1-Why | 2-How | 3-What | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Interests | Values | Goals |
| Dimensions | Action dimension | Evaluation dimension | Potention dimension |
| From | What is important for me (autonomy) | What has meaning to me (coherence) | My competencies |
| To | What is important for us (participation) | What is the meaning for us (connectedness) | The relevance of actions for the bigger situation |
| Concepts | Willing | Judging | Thinking |
| Definitions of the above | The freedom to choose between two or more possibilities and to realize or actualize one of those possibilities | Whoever judges takes responsibility for the world | Thinking is dialogue, the active investigation and articulation of meaning and purpose.Not the thirst for knowledge, but the question of meaning drives thinking activity.Thinking withdraws itself from utility and resides in the domain of purpose and meaning |
.
| Content Source |
|---|
| Het leven van de Geest - Ten Have - 2025 |
.
.
Jay Van Bavel - Judgement
.
| 1-Why | 2-How | 3-What | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Interests | Values | Goals |
| Dimensions | Action dimension | Evaluation dimension | Potention dimension |
| From | What is important for me (autonomy) | What has meaning to me (coherence) | My competencies |
| To | What is important for us (participation) | What is the meaning for us (connectedness) | The relevance of actions for the bigger situation |
| Concepts | Hedonic (decision making) | Moral (decision making) | Pragmatic (decision making) |
| Definitions of the above | Hedonic decisions focussing on pleasure | Based on what’s right or wrong, and rooted in social norms and values,judgment is likely to become loaded with emotion and feels more extreme | Pragmatic decisions weights the practical costs and benefits |
.
Every day, each of us makes countless evaluations. Whether you rely more on a pragmatic, moral or hedonic perspective to evaluate an object or action depends on multiple considerations, including your goals and the social context. The way you look at a problem might change based on how you feel at that moment, or whether you are alone or accompanied by a friend. And this can fundamentally change how you judge the goodness of something. The decision about where to buy a coffee can be based on hedonic ones (eg, which café has the most delicious coffee?), moral ones (eg, is the café ethical in the way they treat their staff ?) or pragmatic considerations (eg, which café has the cheapest prices?).
.
| Content Source |
|---|
| Clara Pretus & Jay Van Bavel |
.
.
John Langshaw Austin - Speech
.
| 1-Why | 2-How | 3-What | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Interests | Values | Goals |
| Dimensions | Action dimension | Evaluation dimension | Potention dimension |
| Description | If I promise that I’ll be home for dinner and later state that I’ll be home for dinner, my actions are instances of the same locutionary act: both actions involve the content that I’ll be home for dinner. However, my actions are instances of different illocutionary acts: one has the force of a promise, while the other has the force of a statement | If I warn that the ice is thin, and so perform one illocutionary act, I may thereby perform a variety of perlocutionary acts: I may persuade someone to avoid it, or encourage someone to take a risk, and so forth | The performance of an act that can be classified by its content (the rhetic act)—a feature distinctively of acts of speech. If I promise that I’ll be home for dinner and then promise that I’ll work late, my actions are instances of two different locutionary acts: one with the content that I’ll be home for dinner, and one with the content that I’ll work late |
| Concepts | The illocutionary act | The perlocutionary act | The locutionary act |
| Definitions of the above | An act classifiable not only by its content - as with the locutionary act - but also by its force (stating, warning, promising, etc.) | An act classifiable by its consequential effects upon the feelings, thoughts, or actions of the audience, or of the speaker, or of other persons | The production of an utterance that can be classified by its phonetic, grammatical, and lexical characteristics, up to sentence meaning |
.
Austin’s discussion of illocutionary acts is bound up with his other discussions of the ways in which assessment of utterances as to truth is dependent upon specific features of the circumstances of utterance (context).
.
| Content Source |
|---|
| Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Lemma: John Langshaw Austin |
.
More to come
.