Hidden layers
Chapter 1 - Worldview
Previous page: Directions - Hidden Layers - Next page: Dimensional thinking and doing
Back to Book content or directly to Main Page or Worldview
.
.
|
.
On the next page, we describe the directions of the third dimension created by the hidden layers.
.
Core idea
.
Our layerd world
.
.
When we look at the world, an image of reality grows as a network of relationships with a layered structure:
- the pre-material layers: the world of subatomic particles
- the physical layers: the inanimate matter
- the biological layers: the living beings
- the temperament layers: intuition, emotion and cognition
- the psychological layers: behaviour, personality and beliefs
- the social layers: interaction
- the cultural layers: business, technical, artistic, intellectual, etc. activities
.
- On the one hand, they structure concepts of life starting from the core dimensions of action and evaluation.
- On the other hand, they create a third dimension in life between competence building and relevance to one's contex
.
The layer concept has little to do with popular (and non-scientific) ideas such as MBTI or DISC.
.
Deep dive
.
Conceptual descriptions of the four positions created by the two basic dimensions in each layer
.
Dreaming between Connectedness and Participation
Between "What is the meaning for us" (CONNECTEDNESS - INVOLVEMENT) and "What is important for us" (PARTICIPATION)
| DREAM |
|---|
|
.
Thinking between Participation and Coherence
Between "What is important for us" (PARTICIPATION) and "What has meaning to me" (COHERENCE)
| THINK |
|---|
|
.
Deciding between Coherence and Autonomy
Between "What has meaning to me" (COHERENCE) and "What is important to me" (AUTONOMY)
| DECIDE |
|---|
|
.
Doing between Autonomy and Connectedness
Between "What is important to me" (AUTONOMY) and "What is the meaning for us" (CONNECTEDNESS - INVOLVEMENT).
| DO |
|---|
|
.
.
Our inner world
| Hidden layers – Frank Wilczek - Physicist, 2004 Nobel Prize in Physics – Edge 2012 |
|---|
| David Hubel and Torstein Wiesel were awarded the 1981 Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine for figuring out what neurons in the visual cortex are doing. They showed that successive hidden layers first extract features of visual scenes that are likely to be meaningful (for example, sharp changes in brightness or colour, indicating the boundaries of objects), and then assemble them into meaningful wholes (the underlying objects).
In every moment of waking life, we translate raw patterns of photons impacting our retinas - photons arriving every which way from a jumble of unsorted sources, and projected onto a two dimensional surface - into the orderly, three-dimensional visual world we experience. Because it involves no conscious effort, we tend to take that everyday miracle for granted. It is the architecture of hidden layers. Hidden layers embody, in a concrete physical form, the fashionable but rather vague and abstract idea of emergence. Each hidden layer neuron has a template. It becomes activated, and sends signals of its own to the next layer, precisely when the pattern of information it's receiving from the preceding layer matches (within some tolerance) that template. But this is just to say, in precision-enabling jargon, that the neuron defines, and thus creates, a new emergent concept |
.
Examples
.
| A personal example: Attachment style layer
Alert. The description below is not intended as (psychomedical) advice but as an example of how our context creates layers of experience related to who we already are. . Secure (Between Connectedness and Participation) If you're fortunate enough to have a secure attachment style, your primary caregivers were probably 'good enough' (the psychoanalyst Donald Winnicott's term for emotionally sensitive and responsive), and you are well placed to enjoy healthy relationships in life. However, the other three main attachment styles are insecure and can lead to difficulties in building and maintaining good relationships. . Anxious (Between Participation and Coherence) An anxious attachment style (sometimes called 'preoccupied' or 'ambivalent') is often due to inconsistent or intrusive parenting, or a blurring of the boundaries between parent/caregiver and child, for example, exposing the child to inappropriately adult emotions and situations, too early in life. Suppose this is your attachment style. In that case, you probably value closeness and connection but find yourself worrying about upsetting others or being rejected. You might tend to assume the worst is happening in a relationship. You might find yourself prone to jealousy and clingy behaviour, or you might be tempted to withdraw and resort to passive aggression, such as giving others the 'silent treatment. . Avoidant (Between Coherence and Autonomy) An avoidant attachment style (sometimes called 'dismissive-avoidant' or 'fearful-avoidant' depending on the accompanying behaviours) is linked to a caregiver's consistent and repetitive rejection of the child's emotional needs. If this was your experience, you might find you always try to cope on your own as an adult. You probably reject the need for relationships or if you are in them, you may find it difficult to become emotionally close or place much value on your partner's looks. You might prefer not to pay too much attention to other people's emotions, and you're probably inclined to see yourself as not having any problems. . Disorganised (Between Autonomy and Connectedness) The final attachment style – the disorganised style (sometimes called 'disoriented') – is best thought of as being trapped in, and responding to, a terrifying and incredibly confusing stay/go paradox. The caregiver (and future potential friends or partners) are both the source of occasional comfort but, more often, the source of threat. This style is linked to severe abuse and neglect in childhood. If this was something you experienced, you might struggle with self-esteem and have perhaps found your subsequent relationships incredibly difficult because of the intense emotions you experience. |
.
Here we present you some examples of layers. The 'vertical' connection beween the layers provides the richness of life.
| Layer | Between Connectedness and Participation | Between Participation and Coherence | Between Coherence and Autonomy | Between Autonomy and Connectedness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DREAM | THINK | DECIDE | DO | |
| Temperament | Arrogance | Intelligence | Pretence | Pleasure |
| Behaviour | Altruism | Perfectionism | Status | Action |
| Attachment | Secure | Anxious | Avoidant | Disorganised |
| Meaningful life (John Vervaeke) | Significance, you have to be connected to something that's really real. | Coherence, that's that nomological structure. Things have to make sense for you. | Purpose, the idea of an over-arching goal | Connectedness, this is how you determine if you have mattering. |
| Thinking cycle | SPMA (Strategise-Plan-Monitor & analyse-Act) | PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) | OODA (Observe-Orient-Decide-Act) | SMPA (Sense-Model-Plan-Act) |
.
.
The (third) potention dimension (created by the layers)
The first two dimensions, action and evaluation, create hidden layers, which form a third potential dimension between competence and relevance in relation to your context.
.
From "My competences" (COMPETENCES) to "The relevance of actions for the bigger situation" (RELEVANCE).
.
| (From "My competences") COMPETENCES |
|---|
|
.
| (To "The relevance of actions for the bigger situation") RELEVANCE |
|---|
*Relevance refers to the relationship or connection between something and the context in which it is being considered. Something relevant is related or applicable to the situation or problem at hand and is, therefore, essential or valuable to consider.
|
.